No. 07-13058
---------------
Custody
---------------
Courtroom 11
Tuesday, January
15, 2008
Commencing at 1:36
p.m.
Before: The
Honorable Rhonda Lee Daniele, Judge
From the Court transcript:
|
 |
|
THE
COURT: "Who are you?"
MR. MAUGER: "I'm sorry, ma'am, Your Honor. My
name is George Mauger. I'm Name Redacted
father."
THE COURT: "Okay. You can't sit at counsel
table with her. You have to sit in the back."
MR. MAUGER: "Am I not allowed to represent her?"
THE COURT: "Are you a lawyer?"
MR. MAUGER: "No, ma'am."
THE COURT: "Well, then absolutely not. You're
not allowed to represent her."
Note to Reader: Oh dear, George must have
been so disappointed. The suit he acquired,
his brown expanding file, his folksy charm & wit would not have
an opportunity on this day to benefit his daughter
as he had hoped.
The
Court questioned Ms. Mauger who said many
unfortunate things about the child's father.
From
the Court transcript:
MS.
MAUGER: "And he -- several of his actions while we
were together would make me not want him to be
around her. He's a liar. He's a thief.
He does drugs. Several times I had to have his
probation officer out at the house because he was
high on cocaine. He doesn't have a license, and I definitely
wouldn't want him driving anywhere, and he pulled a
dildo out in front of a 3 and 4-year-old girl and
boy, and that was actually the weekend before I left
him, and several times when we were together."
Counsel was present to represent the child's father
and while questioning Ms. Mauger, George
interrupted. Several times during the hearing,
George, not unlike a grade school student, raised
his hand when he had comments or questions.
From the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "Would you be surprised to know that your
father indicated to me that you are moving in with
him and his mother?"
MR. MAUGER: "No. No, you got that wrong."
MS. MAUGER: "Yes, I am surprised in
that."
MR.
MAUGER: "She got that wrong."
THE COURT: "Excuse me. You can't just yell out,
Mr. Mauger."
MR. MAUGER: "I'm sorry."
THE COURT: "Put your hand down. Okay.
She's testifying now. You'll get your
opportunity, if she calls you as a witness to
testify, but you just can't blurt out, and you just
can't interrupt the questioning that's going on."
MR. MAUGER: "I apologize, Your Honor."
Later
in the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "Okay. Were you still living with
him?"
MS. MAUGER: "My father?"
ATTORNEY: "Yes."
MS. MAUGER: "No."
ATTORNEY: "Did he move out?"
MS. MAUGER: "He actually went to jail."
ATTORNEY: "Okay. It's true, is it not, that he
went to jail for drug charges?"
MS. MAUGER: "Yes."
ATTORNEY: "Okay. It's true, is it not, that he
went to jail for attempted murder charges?"
MS. MAUGER: "I'm not sure if that was one of his
charges."
ATTORNEY: "Why--"
MS. MAUGER: "I would think that if he was charged
with attempted murder, he wouldn't be out."
ATTORNEY: "Okay. While you were living
together, it's true, is it not, that your father
drew a gun on you?"
MS. MAUGER: "Yes."
ATTORNEY: "Okay."
MS. MAUGER: "But it was not the way that you are
trying to make it sound."
ATTORNEY: "But your father currently watches your
daughter while you're at work now?"
MS. MAUGER: "Yes."
The
questioning turned from George as a topic to the
child's father.
From
the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "Thank you. You mentioned that
incident, I'll quote you, with regard to a dildo?"
MS. MAUGER: "Yes."
ATTORNEY: "Was that his? Did he bring that into the
house?"
MS. MAUGER: "No, it was actually mine, when we lived
together."
ATTORNEY: "Okay. And was this is in a bedroom
that this event took place?"
MS. MAUGER: "No, it was behind the couch."
ATTORNEY: "Okay. And the couch is located
where?"
MS. MAUGER: "In the living room."
ATTORNEY: "In the living room. Okay. So
did you leave it behind the couch?"
MS. MAUGER: "To be honest with you, I'm not really
sure how it got back there. It had chew marks,
so I kind of assume that the dog was playing with it
or something. Who knows?"
Later
in the Court transcript:
THE
COURT: "Do you have any other testimony or any other
witnesses that you would want to provide evidence to
the Court?"
MS.
MAUGER: "I think my dad is a little anxious to come
up and answer --"
THE COURT: "Well, my question is to you, because
you're here representing yourself, pro se. I
could care less is he's sitting out there and he's
anxious to take the stand. Do you have
questions that you like to ask him as far as
presenting additional evidence or testimony before
me?"
MS. MAUGER: "Yes, I would like to ask him some
questions."
THE COURT: "Okay. Mr. Mauger, take the stand."
From the Court transcript:
MS.
MAUGER: "Mr. Mauger, how would you describe your
relationship with Name Redacted?"
MR. MAUGER: "Great, she's the joy of my life.
She's highly intelligent. She just makes my
whole day. We have a real good bond. She
definitely knows who grand pop is. I live with
my mother, who also -- she's 73 years posterity.
So she can occasionally feed her, but she can't lift
her or anything like that. So, you know, we do
everything together. I take her everywhere I'm
going. We play together. We watch
cartoons together. It's like when you have a
child, that's like the biggest blessing of your
life. So it's like I got another chance at
raising a child. I wish I could have another
child on my own, but I can't, but she's definitely a
gift from God."
MS. MAUGER: "Is it true that you're already starting
to potty train her?"
MR. MAUGER: "Yes, that is true, started. She
has nine stars on her chart. Actually, the
first time she went, I took a picture of it for
posterity. I know that sounds sick, but it was
an exciting moment. It's one of those talking
seats, so when you sit on it, it starts to sing to
you, you know."
MS. MAUGER: "Mr. Mauger, when the defendant and I
were still together and living together, and you were
also there, did you ever witness him doing any sort
of drugs or illegal activity while I was away at
work?"
MR. MAUGER: "Yes, I did."
ATTORNEY: "I object, Your Honor."
THE COURT: "What's the objection?"
ATTORNEY: "I think it was asked and answered earlier."
THE COURT: "I don't think I heard it from him.
I heard it from her, but objection overruled."
MS. MAUGER: "Can you answer please?"
|
|
MR. MAUGER: "I get overruled and sustained mixed up.
Yes, on a number of occasions. I,
unfortunately, made a very poor choice, and he got
me started in cocaine, and it was probably one of
the most stupid things I ever did in my life.
I regret it greatly."
MS. MAUGER: "How often would you say that he did it?"
MR. MAUGER: "All the time. He still owes me
money for stuff, oh, please, please, please, you
know." |
|
MS. MAUGER: "Is it true that he is on probation?"
MR. MAUGER: "Yes, to the best of my knowledge."
MS. MAUGER: "And to your knowledge, did he ever have
a -- what they would call a hot urine?"
MR. MAUGER: "Yes, he had them. I know of at
least one occasion with the parole office, and then
several occasions that you had administered the test
yourself." |
MS. MAUGER: "Yes, that's right. And if he did
the cocaine so often, how is it that he never got
caught, other than the ones that I gave him?"
MR. MAUGER: "He had a wonderful recipe. I think
it was -- jeez, I forget. It was cranberry
juice. Jeez, now I can't remember.
Cranberry juice and something else, and he would
drink it by the gallon. He kept in close
contact with Name Redacted, and, you know,
would chit-chat with Name Redacted, and, you
know, try to find out when he was coming around
again. He would talk about jobs and everything
like that. As soon as Name Redacted would
urine test him, it would be a trip down to
Phoenixville to cop again or he'd get some off of
me. I gave him, you know, a good amount, and
he would, you know, party for a while, and when the
time came close, he would start drinking the
cranberry juice, and there was also some tests that
he stole or got a hold of, that somehow flushed it
out of your system and made it invisible for like 24
hours or something."
THE COURT: "Did I hear you just admit on the stand to
being his supplier?"
MR. MAUGER: "I guess I should plead the fifth on
that."
THE COURT: "I guess you should watch what you say
before you say it, because once you say it, it's
subject to cross-examination, and you can't plead
the fifth."
MR. MAUGER: "Okay. I'm sorry, Your Honor.
I'm just being honest. I don't want to lie."
THE COURT: "Well, you can't offer testimony, and then
not answer the questions when cross-examination
comes."
MR. MAUGER: "Okay. I just didn't want to lie."
MS. MAUGER: "No more questions right now, Your Honor."
|
Note to George:
Humor us George - besides your daughter's
former boyfriend, does anyone else owe you money
for cocaine? Not to be nosy, but do you
owe anyone money for cocaine? Might this
activity have something to do with your recent
attempt to get your concealed weapon permit
through Sheriff Durante?
We're just wondering...
We'd also like
to suggest that you refrain from attempting to
practice law at least until you get "overruled"
and "sustained" straight in your mind.
It was
then time for the attorney to Cross-Examine George.
From
the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "Mr. Mauger, you indicated that
Name
Redacted
did drugs and he partied?" MR. MAUGER: "Yes, sir." ATTORNEY: "Is that correct? And it's true, is
it not, that you and him would do drugs together?" MR. MAUGER: "Yes, sir." ATTORNEY: "It's true, is it not, that you were
involved with cocaine prior to meeting Name
Redacted?" MR. MAUGER: "No, sir." ATTORNEY: "So it's your testimony today that you had
no drug use prior to meeting Name
Redacted?" MR. MAUGER: "No." ATTORNEY: "Okay. Did you have any drug use?" MR. MAUGER: "No, other than prescription medication,
no. I made a mistake, and I will never, ever
make that mistake again."
|
ATTORNEY: "Let me ask you this: You said that
Name
Redacted introduced you to cocaine, but then you
indicated that you were supplying him with cocaine?"
MR. MAUGER: "That's correct."
ATTORNEY: "Okay. So his introduction to
cocaine led you to become a supplier?"
MR. MAUGER: "No. No, it would be like you
having cigarettes, and a friend didn't have any
cigarettes, and you gave him some."
|
ATTORNEY: "Okay. But you knew he was on
probation, and not supposed to be using drugs?"
MR. MAUGER: "Yes, that's correct."
ATTORNEY: "Now, were you on probation at the time
also?"
MR. MAUGER: "No, I was not."
ATTORNEY: "Okay. When did your probation end?"
MR. MAUGER: "It hasn't ended."
ATTORNEY: "It hasn't ended?"
MR. MAUGER: "No."
ATTORNEY: "And when did it begin?"
MR. MAUGER: "Oh, jeez, I guess it was in July or
August, somewhere around there."
ATTORNEY: "Of this year?"
MR. MAUGER: "Yeah, I'm not sure."
ATTORNEY: "You were not on probation prior to that
for anything?"
MR. MAUGER: "No, I was not. I've been a
volunteer fireman since I've been 14 posteritys old.
I'm also a member of the fire police or was."
ATTORNEY: "When were you released from jail?"
THE COURT: "Are you still?"
THE WITNESS: "No, ma'am. That was one of my
punishments. I was -- a 36-posterityyear
career down the drain. It was a very stupid
mistake."
THE COURT: "Excuse me just a minute. I heard
that you were in jail. I hear that you were on
probation. For what? Was it drug
related?"
MR. MAUGER: "Some of it was."
THE COURT: "When the incidents occurred, were you a
fireman?"
MR. MAUGER: "Yes, I was."
THE COURT: "So what consequence is it? You're
offering the fact that you were a fireman as though
that sheds some cloak of respectability on you."
MR. MAUGER: "Oh, no, ma'am."
THE COURT: "Okay. That's the way I took your
reference to being a fireman."
MR. MAUGER: "I'm very sorry, Your Honor. I
said that because the humiliation and the
embarrassment, and the cost, it cost me dearly."
THE COURT: "Okay."
MR. MAUGER: "It's something I loved to do."
Later in the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "Okay. It's true, is it not, that
Children & Youth Services at one point indicated
that you were not to be around the minor child?"
MR. MAUGER: "No."
ATTORNEY: "So it's your testimony that you've not
spoken to anyone from Children & Youth, nor your
daughter, Name Redacted, with regard to you
being around the minor child?"
MR. MAUGER: "The only thing that I spoke with
Children & Youth was about -- I can't think of his
name. I'm drawing a blank."
ATTORNEY: "The question is --"
MR. MAUGER: "I can't remember the kid's name."
ATTORNEY: "It's your testimony that no one from
Children & Youth, nor your daughter, Name
Redacted, ever said to you that you're not
supposed to be around the child?"
MR. MAUGER: "That's correct."
The
attorney questioned the child's father.
From the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "After Name Redacted and your
separation, did you know her to live with anyone
else?"
FATHER: "Yeah, I actually found out she was sleeping
with one of my employees about two weeks after I
vacated the home."
Later in the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "Regarding, Name Redacted, do you
know -- has she ever made any threats with regard to
allegations of you interacting with the child?"
FATHER: "Oh, absolutely."
ATTORNEY: "Can you explain that to the Court."
FATHER: "Several times we would get into an
argument. She said she's going to pack her
shit, and move down to South Carolina, and take my
daughter from me, and that would, in turn, aggravate
me, and then we would argue, and things would
escalate from there, several of those incidents.
I remember one specific she told me if I ever gave
her any problems, if we broke up, she would call my
P.O., tell him that I -- can I say this? She
told me that she would tell my P.O. that I finger
fucked my daughter, end quote, and at this point, I
-- pertaining to the fact what I'm on probation for,
any allegations whatsoever would land me in the
hoosegow for a very long time. I'm not going
back. I don't like it. I immediately
spoke to Name Redacted, and Name Redacted
came to the house and confronted Name Redacted
about it, and she admitted what she said."
ATTORNEY: "Can you briefly explain why you did not
trust Mr. Mauger being around the child?"
FATHER: "How much time you got?"
ATTORNEY: "Answer the question."
FATHER: "Mr. Mauger has lived a lifestyle of
thievery, lived a life style, he opened credit cards
in his children's name, ruining --"
MS. MAUGER: "Objection."
FATHER: "--Name Redacted brother's credit."
THE COURT: "What's the objection."
MS. MAUGER: "Hearsay. He doesn't know.
How he would --"
THE COURT: "How do you know that?"
FATHER: "How do I know that? I have proof."
THE COURT: "How do you know it? Tell me how."
FATHER: "Mr. Mauger specifically spoke to me, as
well as Name Redacted."
THE COURT: "If he told you himself or she told you,
you can testify to it. If you found out any
other way, you can't tell me."
FATHER: "Mr. Mauger told me himself."
THE COURT: "Okay. Objection is overruled."
FATHER: "Do I keep going?"
THE COURT: "Yes."
FATHER: "Okay. Mr. Mauger has a problem with
the truth. He has a -- how do they say that?
A habit of lying to government authorities, stating
why, you know, he should still be on Medicare,
Medicaid, have his -- to support his opiate
addiction."
The
attorney questioned the father's parole officer.
From the Court transcript:
ATTORNEY: "Okay. And another incident with
regard to, did Name Redacted ever bring to
your attention certain comments that Name
Redacted would threaten him with regards to the
children, specifically, there was a comment that
Name Redacted indicated she would bring the
child -- she would tell the Court or tell the police
that he inserted his finger into the child?
Did he ever report this to you?"
P.O.: "Name Redacted called me very upset.
As a matter of fact, he also discussed it with his
counselor. He was very, very upset by this,
and he alluded to the fact that she had threatened
him about he -- if she gets angry with him, that he
might have done something to Name Redacted.
Well, I was at the house one afternoon. We
were out on the back porch, and I wanted to address
this with Name Redacted, and I told Name
Redacted basically that those statements made,
they're vicious, that you can't just do that.
Her basic statement to me was, and this was, again,
upsetting and about her temper. She says,
well, I was angry at him, and I just didn't care,
something of that nature."
The Honorable
Rhonda Lee Daniele granted the child's father
visitation on Sunday afternoons.
Regarding the "dildo incident," it was
investigated by the authorities and no charges
were filed.
Regarding the mention of "attempted murder"
charges, we have some information concerning that matter. George's daughter
and her boyfriend had recounted the occasion
when George was angry with a particular man.
George made several phone calls to trick the man
into stopping by the rental home.
Meanwhile, George awaited his arrival with a gun
and a knife and had stated his intention to kill
the man. The boyfriend had quietly called
the man himself and clued him into the true purpose
of the visit, thwarting George's plan. George's daughter and her
boyfriend reported this murder attempt to the
authorities. We're unaware of any charges
brought against George in this matter.
George continues to babysit the child.
|
|
If
you wish, you can obtain your own copy of the
complete transcript from:
Edward McKenna
Official Court Reporter
Montgomery County Courthouse
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
(215) 784-5416
|
|
|
|
|
Dictionary.com
lunkhead
noun slang, a dull or stupid
person; blockhead |
|